SEC Sanctions Colorado-Based Portfolio Manager for Forging Documents and Misleading Chief Compliance Officer

Source- http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370539791420#.UivJS8a1ESE

Washington D.C., Aug. 27, 2013 —

The Securities and Exchange Commission today sanctioned a former portfolio manager at a Boulder, Colo.-based investment adviser for forging documents and misleading the firm’s chief compliance officer to conceal his failure to report personal trades.

An SEC investigation found that Carl Johns of Louisville, Colo., failed to pre-clear or report several hundred securities trades in his personal accounts as required under the federal securities laws and the code of ethics at Boulder Investment Advisers (BIA). Johns concealed the trades in quarterly and annual trading reports that he submitted to BIA by altering brokerage statements and other documents that he attached to those reports. Johns later tried to conceal his misconduct by creating false documents that purported to be pre-trade approvals, and misled the firm’s chief compliance officer in her investigation into his improper trading.

To settle the SEC’s charges – which are the agency’s first under Rule 38a-1(c) of the Investment Company Act for misleading and obstructing a chief compliance officer (CCO) – Johns agreed to pay more than $350,000 and be barred from the securities industry for at least five years.

“Securities industry professionals have an obligation to adhere to compliance policies, and they certainly must not interfere with the chief compliance officers who enforce those policies,” said Julie Lutz, Acting Co-Director of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office. “Johns set out to cover up his compliance failures by creating false documents and misleading his firm’s CCO.”

According to the SEC’s order instituting settled administrative proceedings against Johns, the Investment Company Act required him to submit quarterly reports of his personal securities transactions and annual reports of his securities holdings. His firm’s code of ethics contained further restrictions on when and how Johns could trade in securities, and required his transactions to be pre-cleared by the firm’s chief compliance officer. From 2006 to 2010, Johns failed to comply with these obligations and did not pre-clear or report approximately 640 trades. These included at least 91 trades involving securities held or acquired by the funds managed by the firm. The code of ethics restricted trading in securities that the funds were buying or selling.

According to the SEC’s order, Johns submitted inaccurate quarterly and annual reports and falsely certified his annual compliance with the code of ethics. Johns physically altered brokerage statements, trade confirmations, and pre-clearance approvals before submitting them to the firm along with these reports. For example, he manually deleted securities holdings listed on his brokerage statements before submitting them in order to avoid disclosing securities purchases that were not pre-cleared.

The SEC’s order further finds that Johns created several documents that purported to be pre-clearance requests approved by the firm’s CCO, who had never actually reviewed or approved such trades. Johns created these false pre-clearance approvals to cover up instances in his annual report when securities transactions were not pre-cleared. Johns also altered the trade confirmations that he submitted to BIA by backdating the dates of the transactions, and he backdated trade confirmations to make it falsely appear as though pre-clearances were granted in advance of the transactions.

According to the SEC’s order, the firm’s CCO in late 2010 identified irregularities in the documents that Johns submitted to BIA detailing his personal securities transactions. The irregularities prompted the CCO to make inquiries about his compliance with the firm’s code of ethics, and Johns misled the CCO in response. Johns falsely told the CCO that he had closed certain brokerage accounts when in fact they remained open and were involved in trading that was not pre-cleared as required. Johns also accessed the hard copy file of his previously submitted brokerage statements and physically altered them to create the false impression that his trading was in compliance.

In settling the SEC’s charges, Johns has agreed to pay disgorgement of $231,169, prejudgment interest of $23,889, and a penalty of $100,000. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Johns consented to a five-year bar and a cease-and-desist order.

************************************************************************

Report Securities Fraud by Calling 1-888-985-9844 or by visiting

www.reportsecuritiesfraud.net

SEC Charges John K. Marcum With Conducting Ponzi Scheme Targeting Retirement Savings of Investors

Source- http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370539791027#.UivJTca1ESE

Washington D.C., Aug. 26, 2013 —

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a Noblesville, Ind., resident and his company with defrauding investors in a Ponzi scheme that targeted retirement savings.

The SEC alleges that John K. Marcum touted himself as a successful trader and asset manager to raise more than $6 million through promissory notes issued by his company Guaranty Reserves Trust. Marcum helped investors set up self-directed IRA accounts and gained control over their retirement assets, saying he would earn them strong returns on the promissory notes by day-trading in stocks while guaranteeing the safety of their principal investment. Yet Marcum did little actual trading and almost always lost money when he did. Throughout his scheme, Marcum provided investors with false account statements showing annual returns of more than 20 percent. Meanwhile, he used investor funds to pay for his luxurious personal lifestyle and finance several start-up companies.

The SEC obtained an emergency court order to freeze the assets of Marcum and his company.

“Marcum tricked investors into putting their retirement nest eggs in his hands by portraying himself as a talented trader who could earn high returns while eliminating the risk of loss,” said Timothy L. Warren, Acting Director of the Chicago Regional Office. “Marcum tried to carry on his charade of success even after he squandered nearly all of the funds from investors.”

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Indianapolis, Marcum began his scheme in 2010. Investors gave Marcum control of their assets by either rolling their existing IRA accounts into the newly-established self-directed IRA accounts or by transferring their taxable assets directly to brokerage accounts that Marcum controlled. Marcum and certain investors co-signed the promissory notes, and Marcum then placed them in the IRA accounts.

The SEC alleges that Marcum assured investors he could safely grow their money through investments in widely-held publicly-traded stocks, and he promised annual returns between 10 percent and 20 percent. Marcum also told a number of investors that their principal was “guaranteed” and would never be at risk. He falsely told at least one investor that her principal would be federally insured. In the little trading he has done, Marcum has suffered losses amounting to more than $900,000. He has misappropriated the remaining investor funds for various unauthorized uses.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Marcum used investor money as collateral for a $3 million line of credit at the brokerage firm where he used to work. He took frequent and regular advances from the line of credit to fund such start-up ventures as a bridal store, a bounty hunter reality television show, and a soul food restaurant owned and operated by the bounty hunters. None of these businesses appear to be profitable, and Marcum’s investors were not aware that their money was being used for these purposes. Marcum used nearly $1.4 million of investor money to make payments directly to the start-up ventures and other companies. He also used more than a half-million dollars to pay personal expenses accrued on credit card bills, including airline tickets, luxury car payments, hotel stays, sports and event tickets, and tabs at a Hollywood nightclub.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Marcum did not have the funds needed to honor investor redemption requests. So he provided certain investors with a “recovery plan” that revealed his intention to solicit funds from new investors so that he could pay back his existing investors. Marcum had a phone conversation with three investors in June 2013 and admitted that he had misappropriated investor funds and was unable to pay investors back. During this call, Marcum begged the investors for more time to recover their money. He offered to name them as beneficiaries on his life insurance policies, which he claimed include a “suicide clause” imposing a two-year waiting period for benefits. He suggested that if he is unsuccessful in returning their money, he would commit suicide to guarantee that they would eventually be repaid.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Marcum and Guaranty Reserves Trust violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The SEC sought and obtained emergency relief including a temporary restraining order and asset freeze. The SEC additionally seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and financial penalties from Marcum and Guaranty Reserves Trust, and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains from Marcum Companies LLC, which is named as a relief defendant.

************************************************************************

Report Securities Fraud by Calling 1-888-985-9844 or by visiting

www.reportsecuritiesfraud.net

SEC Stops California Company With Misleading Registration Statement From Issuing Public Stock

Source- http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370539788096#.UivJTsa1ESE

Washington D.C., Aug. 22, 2013 —

The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued an order to stop an initial public offering (IPO) of a Los Angeles area company before its shares were sold to the public. In issuing its stop order against Counseling International, the Commission determined that the company’s registration statement contains false and misleading information.

According to the SEC’s stop order, Counseling International’s registration statement fails to disclose the identity of the company’s control persons and promoters as required under the securities laws. Among other deficiencies, the registration statement falsely describes the circumstances surrounding the departure of the former CEO.

Stop orders proactively prevent fraud by halting the securities registration process before a company’s stock is sold to the public based on a deficient or misleading registration statement. Counseling International first filed a registration statement in August 2012 for an initial public offering of 764,000 shares of common stock. The registration statement has been amended four times since that filing.

“A company’s registration statement is the bedrock on which its stock is offered to the general public, and Counseling International did not provide the accurate and complete information that investors would be entitled to when deciding whether it’s appropriate to invest in the company,” said Michele Layne, Director of the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office. “Rarely do we have the opportunity to prevent investor harm before shares are even sold, but this stop order ensures that Counseling International’s stock cannot be sold in the public markets under this misleading registration statement.”

Counseling International agreed to the issuance of the order instituting the stop order proceeding, and also agreed not to engage or participate in any unregistered offering of securities conducted in reliance on Rule 506 of Regulation D for a period of five years from the issuance of the order.

************************************************************************

Report Securities Fraud by Calling 1-888-985-9844 or by visiting

www.reportsecuritiesfraud.net

SEC Charges North Carolina-Based Investment Adviser for Misleading Fund Board About Algorithmic Trading Ability

Source- http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370539785773#.UivJUMa1ESE

Washington D.C., Aug. 21, 2013 —

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against a North Carolina-based investment adviser and its former owner for misleading an investment fund’s board of directors about the firm’s ability to conduct algorithmic currency trading so they would approve the firm’s contract to manage the fund.

The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that Chariot Advisors LLC and Elliott L. Shifman misled the fund’s board about the nature, extent, and quality of services that the firm could provide as he touted the competitive benefits of algorithmic trading in two presentations before the board. Contrary to what Shifman told the directors, Chariot Advisors did not devise or otherwise possess any algorithms capable of engaging in the currency trading that Shifman was describing. After the fund was launched, Chariot Advisors did not use an algorithm model to perform the fund’s currency trading as represented to the board, but instead hired an individual trader who was allowed to use discretion on trade selection and execution. The misconduct by Shifman and Chariot Advisors caused misrepresentations and omissions in the Chariot fund’s registration statement and prospectus filed with the SEC and viewed by investors.

The case arises out of an initiative by the SEC Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit to focus on the “15(c) process” – a reference to Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 that requires a registered fund’s board to annually evaluate the fund’s advisory agreements. Advisers must provide the board with the truthful information necessary to make that evaluation. Other enforcement actions taken against misconduct in the investment contract renewal process and fee arrangements include cases against Morgan Stanley Investment Management, a sub-adviser to the Malaysia Fund, and two mutual fund trusts affiliated with the Northern Lights Variable Trust fund complex.

“It is critical that investment advisers provide truthful information to the directors of the registered funds they advise,” said Julie M. Riewe, Co-Chief of SEC Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit. “Both boards and advisers have fiduciary duties that must be fulfilled to ensure that a fund’s investors are not harmed.”

According to the SEC’s order instituting administrative proceedings, the false claims by Chariot and Shifman defrauded the Chariot Absolute Return Currency Portfolio, a fund that was formerly within the Northern Lights Variable Trust fund complex. In December 2008 and again in May 2009, Shifman misrepresented to the Chariot fund’s board that his firm would implement the fund’s investment strategy by using a portion of the fund’s assets to engage in algorithmic currency trading. Chariot fund’s initial investment objective was to achieve absolute positive returns in all market cycles by investing approximately 80 percent of the fund’s assets under management in short-term fixed income securities, and using the remaining 20 percent of the assets under management to engage in algorithmic currency trading.

According to the SEC’s order, Chariot Advisors did not have an algorithm capable of conducting such currency trading. The ability to conduct currency trading was particularly significant for the Chariot fund’s performance, because in the absence of an operating history the directors focused instead on Chariot Advisors’ reliance on models when the board evaluated the advisory contract. Even though Shifman believed that the fund’s currency trading needed to achieve a 25 to 30 percent return to succeed, Shifman never disclosed to the board that Chariot Advisors had no algorithm or model capable of achieving such a return.

According to the SEC’s order, because Chariot Advisors possessed no algorithm, currency trading for the fund was under the control of an individual trader who was not using an algorithm for at least the first two months after the fund’s launch. Shifman had interviewed the trader prior to her hiring and knew that she used a technical analysis, rules-based approach for trading that combined market indicators with her own intuition. The trader traded currencies for the fund until Sept. 30, 2009 when she was terminated due to poor trading performance. Subsequently, Chariot employed a third party who utilized an algorithm to conduct currency trading on behalf of the Chariot fund.

The SEC’s order alleges that the misconduct by Chariot and Shifman, who lives in the Raleigh area, resulted in violations of Sections 15(c) and 34(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8. A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to determine whether the allegations contained in the order are true and whether any remedial sanctions are appropriate.

************************************************************************

Report Securities Fraud by Calling 1-888-985-9844 or by visiting

www.reportsecuritiesfraud.net